Perception of risk, knowledge and preparation before ethylene oxide leaks in workers of the Guantánamo pediatric hospital

Authors

Keywords:

Ethylene oxide/chemistry; ethylene oxide/toxicity; hazardous substances/toxicity; risk perception; occupational risks; occupational health; health personnel; chemical emergency; hospital safety.

Abstract

Background: The unsafe handling of ethylene oxide can generate leaks with serious consequences for the health of workers.

Objective: To evaluate the risk perception, the knowledge (conceptual domain) about the effects of ethylene oxide and the preparation to face leak scenarios in workers of the Guantánamo Pediatric Hospital.

Methodology: Observational, descriptive and cross-sectional study. An anonymous survey was applied to 184 workers (census sampling, response rate 96.3%) by means of a Likert scale 1–5, labor characteristics, knowledge on the effects of ethylene oxide, perception of risk and preparation for emergencies were explored. The instrument was validated by expert judgment (content validity >0.91) and showed high internal consistency (Cronbach's Alpha 0.89) A descriptive bivariate analysis was conducted (chi-square and Mann-Whitney U) and content analysis of an open question.

Results: Only 19% received training in the last year. The conceptual domain of acute and chronic effects was low (medians of 3 in both, on a scale of 1-5) 88% perceived a leak as a serious event (median 5). Preparation was the most deficient dimension with medians from 1 to 2 in most items, especially in knowledge of the own role in the face of a leak (median 2) and conducting of drills (medians 1).Three categories were identified in the open question: Demand for training (92.3%), need for drills (60.7%) and lack of resources (35.7%).

Conclusions: There is a high perception of gravity but it coexists with a low conceptual domain and an insufficient preparation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. ISO 11135:2014. Sterilization of health-care products — Ethylene oxide — Requirements for the development, validation and routine control of a sterilization process for medical devices. [Internet]. [cited 2026 Apr 18; published 2.ª ed 2014 and revised 2024]. Disponible en: https://www.iso.org/standard/56137.html

2. WHO/IARC. Agents Classified by the IARC Monographs, Volumes 1-142 [Internet]. France: IARC/WHO; [cited 2026 Apr 18; Last update: 2026 Jul 3]. Disponible en: https://monographs.iarc.who.int/agents-classified-by-the-iarc

3. Valdrés-López A, Ezquerra-Lou M, Bruna-Barranco I, Martínez-Giménez L, López-Zapater B, Maestre-Aguilar R. Esterilización mediante óxido de etileno en centros hospitalarios. análisis de los riesgos para los trabajadores y legislación vigente. Revista Sanitaria de Investigación [Internet]. 2021 [citado 30 Abr 2026];2(6). Disponible en: https://revistasanitariadeinvestigacion.com/esterilizacion-mediante-oxido-de-etileno-en-centros-hospitalarios-analisis-de-los-riesgos-para-los-trabajadores-y-legislacion-vigente/

4. Salazar Hernández L. Percepción de riesgo. Una reflexión en torno al concepto. Joven Educador [Internet]. 2022 [citado 30 Abr 2026];(39):4-15. Disponible en: http://revistas.ucpejv.edu.cu/index.php/rJEdu/article/view/1412/1782

5. Román Hernández EJ, Román Hernández JJ. La comunicación y la motivación de la conducta en la construcción subjetiva de la percepción de riesgo. A propósito de la pandemia de COVID-19. Anales de la ACC [Internet]. 2021 [citado 30 Abr 2026];11(3). Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/pdf/aacc/v11n3/2304-0106-aacc-11-03-e935.pdf

6. Priolo G, Vignoli M, Nielsen K. Risk perception and safety behaviors in high-risk workers: A systematic literature review. Safety Science [Internet]. 2025 [cited 2026 Apr 18];186. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2025.106811

7. Wiig S, Calderwood CJ, O’Hara J. Sailing Too Close to the Wind? How Harnessing Patient Voice Can Identify Drift towards Boundaries of Acceptable Performance. Healthcare (Basel) [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2026 Apr 18];12(15). Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12151532

8. CEPAL/ OPS. La urgencia de invertir en los sistemas de salud en América Latina y el Caribe para reducir la desigualdad y alcanzar los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible - Red de Desarrollo Social de América Latina y el Caribe (ReDeSoc) [Internet]. Naciones Unidas: CEPAL/ OPS; 2024. [citado 30 Abr 2026]. Disponible en: https://www.cepal.org/es/publicaciones/80763-la-urgencia-invertir-sistemas-salud-america-latina-caribe-reducir-la-desigualdad

9. Lynch HN, Kozal JS, Russell AJ, Thompson WJ, Divis HR, Freid RD, et al. Systematic review of the scientific evidence on ethylene oxide as a human carcinogen. Chem Biol Interact [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2026 Apr 18];364. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbi.2022.110031

10. Ruiz-González LA, Piñera-Castro HJ, Smith-Groba J. Impacto del bloqueo estadounidense sobre el sistema cubano de salud en la última década. Rev cuba Med Mil [Internet]. 2023 [citado 30 Abr 2026];52(1). Disponible en: https://revmedmilitar.sld.cu/index.php/mil/article/view/2469/1737

11. Haro SAF, Chisag PER, Ruiz SJP, Caicedo PJE. Tipos y clasificación de las investigaciones. LATAM Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades [Internet]. 2024 [citado 18 Apr 2026];5(2). Disponible en: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=9541046

12. Astudillo-Villalba FR, González-Lara CA, Nin-Valenzuela RA. Diseño y validación de un instrumento para analizar las concepciones y prácticas de los docentes sobre la modelación matemática. Espacios [Internet]. 30 de Enero 2026 [citado 18 Abr 2026];47(1):121-33. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.48082/espacios-a26v47n01i10

13. Romero M del C, Álvarez MB. Usos del término Likert. Una revisión en estudios sobre aprendizaje organizacional. Investigación operativa [Internet]. 2022 [citado 18 Abr 2026];30(51):41-57. Disponible en: https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/epio/article/view/37820

14. Norman G. Likert scales, levels of measurement and the «laws» of statistics. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2026 Apr 18];15(5):625-32. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-010-9222-y

15. Anaya EV. Análisis cualitativo en la investigación. Rediech [Internet]. 2024 [citado 18 Abr 2026];15. Disponible en: https://revistas.rediech.org/index.php/ie_rie_rediech/article/view/2074/2140

16. Asociación Médica Mundial. Principios éticos para las investigaciones médicas en participantes humanos-Declaración de Helsinki [Internet]. AMM; 2024. [citado 8 Jul 2026]. Disponible en:

https://www.wma.net/es/policies-post/declaracion-de-helsinki-de-la-amm-principios-eticos-para-las-investigaciones-medicas-en-seres-humanos/

17. Zhang K, Ye G, Xiang Q, Chang Y. Influencing mechanism of optimism bias on construction worker’s unsafe behavior: the role of risk perception and risk propensity. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management [Internet]. 2026 [cited 2026 Sep 30]. Disponible en: https://www.sciencedirect.com/org/science/article/abs/pii/S0969998826000287

18. OSHA. Ethylene oxide standar. eCFR: 29 CFR 1910.1047 [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2026 Jun 30]. Disponible en: https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-29/subtitle-B/chapter-XVII/part-1910/section-1910.1047

Published

2026-11-09

How to Cite

1.
Cabrejas Speck HY, García González A. Perception of risk, knowledge and preparation before ethylene oxide leaks in workers of the Guantánamo pediatric hospital. Gac méd espirit [Internet]. 2026 Nov. 9 [cited 2026 Nov. 12];28. Available from: https://revgmespirituana.sld.cu/index.php/gme/article/view/2899

Issue

Section

RESEARCH ARTICLES (Original)